Thursday, March 10, 2011

my envir. ethics

Halie Cousineau 3/18/11
My Environmental Ethic Eng. 308j
?Title?
If someone where to ask me about my opinions on the environment they better be sit down because they are going to get a mouth full. Ever since I was little you could ask me about what I thought of the environment and I would have had an answer for you. Granted when I was little I would have told you it is beautiful, it’s fun to play in, and I love it because it is my home. Now if you ask me I would say the same answers but also more. Throughout my life the environment has always been something extremely important to me so it is only natural that my environmental ethic is what it is. I believe that, maybe without knowing, I have always believed in Biocentrism and Ecocentrism, even as a kid.
My opinions and how I feel about the environment starts early in my life. I think it all started with my primal education; my parents. My parents brought my brother and I up in a way where I cannot separate the outdoors from my everyday life. They grew us up to enjoy and love being outside and everything that goes with it. Even family time was spent outside, we eat outside every minute we can, we do every outdoor sport, and we also make up reasons to work outside. I think that my beliefs started at a young age not only because I spent so much time outside but because I was very active in nature and educated about it at a young age. All my life my parents, brother and I have gone on hour long walks through our woods, were my parents would point out tracks of animals, and different types of trees or plants they know. We also chop our own woods, pick wild fruits and berries, ice skated on our pond, when it’s frozen, sail sometimes to no where, just to enjoy being on the water, and watching deer eat apples off one of our trees during lunch. A lot of my life has been formulated around the environment, weather it be the ocean or the forest. My life is all about doing activities outdoors therefore the outdoors is my home. It is something that I live in and with. I want it to look beautiful and feel great like the way it makes me feel so I treat it with respect. It is hard to come up with just one memory that makes me thinking of the environment and how it influences me because my life is what made me who I am, which is a person dedicating her life to improving the planet, mainly dealing with environmental issues.
Before taking this class I would say that my environmental ethics were the same as they are now or at least extremely similar. Although this class did increase my drive, like most environmental classes I take, giving me more motivation to change and to become more sustainable. Education of course has always been a massive influence on me. The more environmental classes I take and the more research I do, the more important it becomes to me and it gives me things to work towards. My love for the natural world has always been apart of me; it has always played a vital role in what my life will be. When I research a topic like the ones I did in this class, it brings out strong emotions I have toward that problem and inspires me to change it. After researching overfishing and seeing something like shark fining it really emanates inside of me my feelings toward how humans treat animals. I believe that animals and nature itself is just as important as humans; humans are animals so I find it ridiculous that we consider ourselves something better than what we are. I feel that everything has an instrumental use to it, but only to a certain extent should it be used. Everything in nature can be used for something, but that is just one level of their worth to me, an important one, but what the world has to offer has more to it than what we, as humans, take out of it.
Throughout history humans have used the world for themselves. Cutting down tress for their homes, killing animals not just for food but also for entertainment, and extracting anything we can that will benefit us. I do not believe in this destructive way of like. My reasons why are best described into two environmental ethics: Biocentrism and Ecocentrism.
I strongly believe all things, living or nonliving, have a value above what it can be used for. Biocentrism supports how I believe humans should be treating animals and plants: it means that everything in the world has value but this value is not based on humans it is based on nature ("ecocentrism"). I do not place a value on something because of what it can give to me. I think all life, human or not, has equal value. I would like to think that the reason people do not treat animals like they treat humans is not because of greed but because they are separated and cannot relate to the animals “we reached the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes. I realized then, and have known ever since, that there was something new to me in those eyes – something known only to her and to the mountain.” (Dobrin ,89). This quote from Thinking Like a Mountain shows that the man in the story did not realized the consequences of his actions until he saw the wolf die in front of him, and then later in life he and society saw the lasting effects of killing off wolves. This is just one example of how using or killing something for human satisfaction is not always good for the rest of the world and the human want for something should not why something is killed or extracted.
Ecocentrism is also something I strongly believe in. It means to think and work for an entire ecosystem rather than humans want ("Ecospherics Ethics"). It is like working on a team, what is best for one person my not be the best choice or the entire team and their sustainability of surviving together. “Human value systems have traditionally been inward-looking, preoccupied with the immediate concerns of the individual, and by extension, of society and culture” ("Ecospherics Ethics"). Ecocentric however has a boarder out look on these viewpoints. Ecocentric is usually my main argument when I talk about sustainable ways of life. In my last two papers I talked specific places on Earth that are being injured by humans that do not think in an ecocentric way. My paper about overfishing is a prime example of how overfishing is hurting an ecosystem therefore having other ripping effects on ocean diversity, the increase of animal extinction, and a decrease in a human food source. In one of the readings from class in Saving Place the story Save the Whales, Screw the Shrimp, is not only a great example of a form of overfishing but it talks about how humans don’t stop for the environment: "When you love something, it had better watch out, because you have a tendency to love it to death"( Dobrin ,205). Another quote from this reading to express how humans abuse the environment is "wild things exist only of you have the graciousness to allow them to"( Dobrin ,208). I also wrote a paper on the killing of Virginian Gorillas in Central Africa, this story shows how even things like warfare and the charcoal making business can not only effect gorillas in the surrounding areas but also the habitat and the people in theses areas. I believe that the entire world is one ecosystem with many more ecosystems inside and each has to work together in order for the world to be successful and survive.
These two environmental ethics that I have gave me different feeling and ideas, than those who do not share my environmental ethics, on many different things we looked at for class. The movie Food Inc. gives a very strong sense of anger, sadness, and determination after watching it. This movies played a lot towards what I think; it not only explained the horrible treatment of animals and how they should be treated better but also how the food industry can not be supported forever by the worlds ecosystems. My environmental ethics also played a role in how certain readings made me feel. Many people in class did not like the tone of Save the Whales, Screw the Shrimp because of the way it was telling the audience what they are doing wrong in the world in a semi sarcastic manner. However I love that pieces, but that is probably because I agree with what the author was saying. It probably also didn’t bother me as much because I make conscious efforts to be environmentally friendly so something mentioned in the book are things that I don’t do, like eat fish or____. I think because I try to be environmentally friendly reading or watching about bad things humans do to the planet doesn’t upset me as much as it does make me happy to see that others share my opinion and are trying to get the word out. I tend to have very strong opinions on different topics and the environment happens to be a topic that I have cared about since before I can remember.
As a kid my life was just a big imaginary world and outside was the setting. I didn’t need a play set, or a fenced in yard like a dog, I had miles of freedom in woods that my parents let me experience to the fullest. I was not given boundaries because my parents let me learn them, understand and respect them. Of course I am not sure they knew what they were creating. At a very young age of about 7 I laid in a bush all day to protest against my dad who wanted to tare the bush up. My parents thought it wasn't very attractive, yet to me it was beautiful, it was playhouse and an imaginary world that I could play in anytime I wanted. I have always been one to be outside and enjoying what it gives to me, like music of the wind in the trees or birds chirruping and how the sun makes me feel happy. The woods give me peace, a place to go, somewhere to be a lone or to play in. My playground as a kid was the rocks, trees, grass, and berries around me. My childhood is inseparable from the outdoors and it still is inseparable from me now even more so now since I understand the importance of the relationships in an ecosystem. Therefore I believe in Biocentrism and Ecocentrism. Throughout my life the environment has always been something extremely important to me and it will continue to be so for the rest of my life


Reference:
"Biocentrism." ecocentrism. N.p., 2011. Web. 8 Mar 2011. .

Dobrin, sidney. saving Place An Ecocomposition Reader. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill, 2005. 87-90. Print.

Dobrin, sidney. saving Place An Ecocomposition Reader. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill, 2005. 203-213. Print.

"Ecospherics Ethics." N.p., Feb. 2009. Web. 8 Mar 2011. .

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

More information about bycatch if you are interested:

The Oceans

Halie Cousineau 2/24/11

Envir. Issue English 308j

"The fish don’t stand a chance"

Environmental sustainable issues today deal with many things humans consume, whether it is food, water, fossil fuels, or fish. Fish may not be the first thing that comes to mind when someone talks about environmental sustainable issues but the oceans are being overfished and many marine species are in danger of collapsing ("MarineBio"). The oceans cover about 71 % of the surface of earth and they provide the largest amount of protein for humans ("help save the sea") but about 80% of fish are almost completely depleted (Koster, "Why is overfishing). The decrease in the fish population and diversity is mainly affected by overfishing. Overfishing has a large negative effect on the fish population because of the destructive fishing techniques, and the general overfishing of depleting species, but there are ways to help recover the fish in the sea.

The fish people buy at the grocery story are not caught by the methods most people may think. Fishing has received the name industrial fishing because large ships with processing plants, refrigeration storage and packing plants on board go out fishing with sonar to point out where to catch the fish that will be sold around the world ("Background”). These fish are also not caught by the pole and line method they could be caught with FADs, which is a fish attraction devices, or drift nets, dredging, harpooning, and more ("Fishing on Line"). Two extremely destructive and popular forms of fishing are long line fishing and bottom trawling.

Although most humans have not been able to explore the ocean floor we know that it is just as diverse as dry land. There are plants and animals living in habitats like in your back yard ("USGS"). But when bottom trawlers fish they tear up the floor of the ocean. Bottom trawling is a form of fishing where a large net is dragged behind the back of a boat, however this is no ordinary net. These nets that are dragged along the bottom of the ocean have metal plates and wheels along the bottom of the net to collect everything in its path. "Think of it as driving a huge bulldozer through an unexplored, lush and richly populated forest and being left with a flat, featureless desert. It's like blowing up Mars before we get there” ("Bottom trawling"). This method of fishing is not only pulling everything up from the bottom the ocean, but all the fish caught are not being used; "bottom trawling operations catch 20 pounds of “bykill” for every pound of targeted species" ("Bottom trawling impacts”). This means most of the fish caught are unwanted and thrown back into the ocean, usually dead: “many creatures end up mistakenly caught and thrown overboard dead or dying, including endangered fish and even vulnerable deep-sea corals which can live for several hundred years“ ("Marine Conservation Biology Institute"). It is said that 90% that is caught in bottom trawling is thrown back ("Marine Conservation Biology Institute"). Bottom trawling has even more problems; it causes a large stir up of the ocean sediment, to the point where the clouds of sediment can be seen from satellite imagery long after the trawlers have been there ("Bottom trawling impacts”). Bottom trawling is just one of many destructive and abusive forms of fishing, another way to fish that also causes environmental issues is long line fishing.

Long line fishing is dragging a long line about 50 to 100 km in length behind or under the back of a boat. This line will have hooks placed along it with bait to attract and catch as many fish as possible, but the intended catch is shark, tuna or swordfish ("Fishing on Line"). Long line fishing is banned in some areas like the United States along the Pacific Coast; it is banned because the negative impact it has on marine life (stop shark fining). Yet long lining is still used around the world and it is a popular form of fishing. This method of fishing is a large threat to many marine life, not just to fish but to marine mammals: “They are indiscriminate - they catch not only the "target", but endangered sharks, leatherback and loggerhead turtles, and seabirds, especially albatross. Over 25% of long-line catch is thrown back into the sea, usually dead” ("Fishing on Line"). Long Line fishing also has a direct connection to shark fining.

Shark fining is not only a wasteful form of collecting food but it is viewed by many to be cruel. Sharks are very important to the sustainability of oceans because they are the top ocean predator that controls fish and other marine life populations (Drinkard). However sharks are being caught for their fins, which are cut off and then the body of the shark is thrown back into the ocean. Many times the shark will still be alive when thrown back into the water (Nichols). A popular way to catch sharks for their fins is to use long line fishing (stop shark fining). “The National Marine Fisheries Service reports that in 1999, 87,576 sharks were caught on long lines in Hawaiian waters, and about 29,000 of them were released alive. And 57,286 were finned" (Nichols). Long lining is not always used for the fining of sharks however when the sharks are unintentionally caught they have a low survival rate. Overfishing has a lot to do with improper or illegal fishing techniques and fishing species that are vital to a balanced ecosystem but also sometimes fish are just fished too much in an area.

Overfishing causes fish stocks to decrease so much that they cannot recover ("MarineBio"). This is happening everywhere around the world due to the demand of fish because we are extremely dependent on fish for food. Due to the demand of specific fish the prices are increasing making it more appealing for people and governments to industrialize fishing (Nuttall). Over 3.4 billions people’s primary food source is the ocean and it is said that this number could double to 7 billion in the next 20 years ("Help Save the Sea"). The result of overfishing is “52% of fish stocks are fully exploited, 20% are moderately exploited, 17% are overexploited, 7% are depleted, and 1% is recovering from depletion” (Koster, "Why is overfishing”). One of the biggest problems with overfishing is the overfishing of specific fish. “Seven of the top ten marine fisheries, accounting for about 30% of all capture fisheries production, are fully exploited or overexploited” and “As many as 90% of all the ocean’s large fish have been fished out” ("Poorly managed fishing"). Although the oceans are being overfished there is optimism and things people can do to help reduce the demand of fish to diminish overfishing.

Overfishing is becoming a large problem that could expand to an even larger one within years, but there are ways to change what is happening. One small action taken by everyone such as eating the fish that are in-season would be very helpful. Save the Sea says, "Not all seafood is created equal. There are good - and - bad choices for the ocean." so being a conscious shopper and consumer could help. Save the Sea labels good fish choices as eating fish that have a high populations and also eating this type of fish in a sustainable way. The best way to know what to eat or buy is being educated on the subject and spreading the word once you know. A great place to look at if you are unsure is: http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/download.aspx. This website is for the Seafood Watch where they give you a guide to seafood depending on the area you live in ("Seafood Watch"). Other things can be done too like putting limits on the amount of fish that can be caught and on the "bycatch". This would limit not only the amount of fishing coming out of the sea but also the fish that are killed but are not used in fishing practices like long lining and bottom trawling (Koster, "What can I do"). In order to have these regulations there would need to be enforcement of the fish caught, to ensure no illegal fishing takes place. Another thing that is starting to happen is the protection of specific areas, mainly important and pristine areas. Theses locations would be the sea floor, coral reefs, estuaries and other important habitats for fish (Koster, "What can I do").

“Overfishing cannot continue,” warned Nitin Desai, Secretary General of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, which took place in Johannesburg. “The depletion of fisheries poses a major threat to the food supply of millions of people" (Nuttall). Overfishing is becoming a problem and this problem will increase over time creating a deficit in a major food source. Although the failing fish population does have another element creating a decrease overfishing plays a large role in it. Some things that have a direct correlation with overfishing and fish populations decreasing is destructive fishing techniques, and the general overfishing of depleting species, but there are ways to help stop overfishing and it is an obtainable goal.

Reference:

"Background: Industrial fishing: emptying our seas." GreenPeace. 17 June 2008. Web. 24 Feb 2011. oceans/stop-bottom-trawling/industrial-fishing-emptying-o/>.

"Bottom trawling." GreenPeace. juniperblue, 2011. Web. 23 Feb 2011. trawlin

"Bottom trawling impacts, clearly visible from space." Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

Drinkard, Annie. "Shark Facts." N.p., March 2009. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

"Exploring the deep ocean floor: Hot springs and strange creatures." USGS. juniperblue, 24 june 1999. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

"Fishing Methods." Fishing on Line. juniperblue, Web. 24 Feb 2011. .

"Interesting Ocean Facts." help save the sea. Web. 23 Feb 2011.

Koster, Pepijn. "What can I do to help." Overfishing- A global disaster. 2011. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

Koster, Pepijn. "Why is overfishing a problem." Overfishing- A global disaster. 2011. Web. 24 Feb 2011. .

Nichols, Katherine. "Sharks benefit from efforts to protect their environment." 14 Jan. 2001. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

Nuttall, Nick. "Overfishing: a threat to marine biodiversity." . Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

"Our oceans are being plundered ." Poorly managed fishing. WWF. Web. 23 Feb 2011. shing/>.

"Protecting Marine Ecosystems." Marine Conservation Biology Institute. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

"Select a Seafood Watch Pocket Guide." Seafood Watch. N.p., 2011. Web. 25 Feb 2011. px>.

"Sustainable Fisheries." MarineBio. 2008. Web. 24 Feb 2011. fisheries.asp>.

"What are long lines?." stop shark finning. Web. 23 Feb 2011. .

Videos:

"OCEAN of TRUTH." Web. .

"Sharks are going extinct; help save them!." Web. =1&list=QL&index=39>.

"The Truth About Bottom Trawling." Web. dex=3>.